Apollo Film Services · Homepage concepts · Internal team review

Three homepage directions for Apollo

Each concept is a complete, working homepage with the same facts and the same pool of reference photographs, so the choice is about direction, not content. Open each one on a laptop and on a phone before scoring.

The concepts

What differs

AspectA — The PremiereB — The Production PartnerC — Georgia in Frame
First impressionA cinema screen: one dramatic image, the offer beneath it.A clear statement of what Apollo does, with the service list already on screen.A place: the title and a wide panorama of Tbilisi.
Information hierarchyExperience → services → locations → process → inquiry. Fewer words per screen.Services → experience → workflow → locations → inquiry. Most information early.Locations → how Apollo supports a shoot → experience → services and workflow → inquiry.
Image treatmentLetterboxed 2.39:1 frames on ink. Images as film stills.One portrait photo in the opening; three location photos later as supporting evidence.Panoramas and a gallery of mixed proportions; images carry the page.
Signature interactionFrame sequence: previous/next buttons, thumbnails, arrow keys.Service index: expandable rows with “what we handle” and “what to send us”.Location filter: five categories with a clear action and a production note for each.
MotionSlow image reveal and cross-fades between frames.Accordion and hover only. Nothing delays reading.A short pan on the opening panorama and a fade when the gallery filter changes.
InquirySide panel over the page.Form on the page, in the final section.Side panel over the page.

Shared in all three

  • The approved AP logo (concept 02 Aperture), Ink/Paper/Signal colours and Inter.
  • Film production services in Georgia; the team’s 20+ years of experience; partners in Georgia and abroad.
  • Services: planning, locations, permits, crew, casting, equipment, studios, transport, accommodation, post-production support.
  • Navigation: Services, Georgia, About, Contact (same-page anchors).
  • The inquiry prepares a local draft to copy or download. It sends and stores nothing.

Content still needed

  • Approved project credits, roles and images. There is no Projects section until these exist.
  • Team biographies and portraits.
  • Apollo’s own location photography or footage to replace the reference photographs.
  • The contact destination: email address, form backend or both.
  • Office address and legal details, if they will be published.

About the photographs

All photographs are reference images of real places in Georgia from Wikimedia Commons, used for this review under their Creative Commons or public-domain terms. They are not Apollo’s work and do not show Apollo productions. Each page credits the photographs it uses in its footer; sources and licences are listed in ASSET-SOURCES.md.

Your scores

Saved in this browser on this device only. Nothing is shared or collected: use “Download my scores” and send the file to the person making the decision.

Score each concept from 1 (weak) to 5 (strong)
Criterion (1 weak – 5 strong)ABC
The offer is clear in the opening screen
The company feels credible and capable
The design feels distinctive to Apollo
I can find and understand the services
Georgia’s role in the offer is clear
The inquiry action is easy to find
The mobile page works well
The page is readable and comfortable to use
Total out of 40000
Preferred concept
Printable scorecard (Markdown)